<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheesy Celebrity&#8217;s Catchy Cause Celebre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatganesha.com/2007/09/28/cheesy-celebritys-catchy-cause-celebre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatganesha.com/2007/09/28/cheesy-celebritys-catchy-cause-celebre/</link>
	<description>idol ramblings, holy irreverent.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Ganesha</title>
		<link>http://greatganesha.com/2007/09/28/cheesy-celebritys-catchy-cause-celebre/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Ganesha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatganesha.com/?p=671#comment-592</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know. it definitely does some good, and no harm. but somehow it doesn&#039;t rub me the right way. and i&#039;m not quite sure why. it just doesn&#039;t seem genuine to me. it seems more self-serving than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know. it definitely does some good, and no harm. but somehow it doesn&#8217;t rub me the right way. and i&#8217;m not quite sure why. it just doesn&#8217;t seem genuine to me. it seems more self-serving than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chapatikid</title>
		<link>http://greatganesha.com/2007/09/28/cheesy-celebritys-catchy-cause-celebre/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chapatikid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatganesha.com/?p=671#comment-591</guid>
		<description>You are being a tad cynical. Carrey&#039;s not doing it to promote himself. Also, everyone campaigned for Mandela&#039;s freedom and it was won, so why not for Aung San Suu Kyi? It&#039;s true. Most Americans DON&#039;T know who she is, and if a celebrity does make it their cause du jour, at least ten more people will learn something. I see no harm in that. Or reason to be cynical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are being a tad cynical. Carrey&#8217;s not doing it to promote himself. Also, everyone campaigned for Mandela&#8217;s freedom and it was won, so why not for Aung San Suu Kyi? It&#8217;s true. Most Americans DON&#8217;T know who she is, and if a celebrity does make it their cause du jour, at least ten more people will learn something. I see no harm in that. Or reason to be cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

